Final MySQL sprint – comments

Section 1

Team 1 – 100

• near perfect peer rating   – 33
• SCRUM/github –  good use – almost all team members commit – 34
• structure of db/implementation of features:  -33

Team 2 – 90

• peer rating – 29
• SCRUM/github – bcordova only one committing other than one instance of ‘unknown’. – 28
• structure of db/implementation of features – meets requirements -33

Team 3 – 92

• peer rating – 2nd best peer score – 31
• SCRUM/github – work doesn’t seem equally distributed. mmartin main contributor – 28
• structure of db/implementation of features – 33

Team 4 – 89

• peer rating – 29
• SCRUM/github – almost all commits by ‘unknown’ no comments for commit – 27
• structure of db/implementation of features – 33

Section 2

Team 1 – 95

• peer rating – 33
• SCRUM/github – bhall, nickle, joe sole contributors – 29
• structure of db/implementation of features – 33

Team 2 – 96

• peer rating – rated low on ease of install – 31
• SCRUM/github – best use of SCRUM and github in both sections – 34
• structure of db/implementation of features – 31