Main

Sprint Assesssment

Sprint 2 Assessment

Section 1

Team 1 -

  • Scrum Methodology /25
  • Git Methodology /20
  • 1 click install /5
  • Update query used /15
  • order of rows /15
  • Sessions /15
  • Quality /5

Section 1

Team 1 - 95

  • Scrum Methodology 22/25
  • Git Methodology 19/20
  • 1 click install 5/5
  • Update query used 15/15
  • order of rows 15/15
  • Sessions 14/15
  • Quality 5/5

Team 2 - 90

  • Scrum Methodology 22/25
  • Git Methodology 18/20
  • 1 click install 2/5
  • Update query used 15/15
  • order of rows 14/15
  • Sessions 15/15
  • Quality 3/5

Team 3 - 92

  • Scrum Methodology 22/25
  • Git Methodology 18/20
  • 1 click install 3/5
  • Update query used 15/15
  • order of rows 15/15
  • Sessions 15/15
  • Quality 3/5

Team 4 - 83

  • Scrum Methodology 21/25
  • Git Methodology 15/20
  • 1 click install 3/5
  • Update query used 12/15
  • order of rows 15/15
  • Sessions 15/15
  • Quality 2/5

Section 2

Team 1 - 90

  • Scrum Methodology 21/25
  • Git Methodology 15/20
  • 1 click install 5/5
  • Update query used 15/15
  • order of rows 15/15
  • Sessions 14/15
  • Quality 5/5

Team 2 - 92

  • Scrum Methodology 24/25
  • Git Methodology 18/20
  • 1 click install 3/5
  • Update query used 15/15
  • order of rows 15/15
  • Sessions 13/15
  • Quality 4/5

Sprint 1 Assessment

How I assessed

  • I used git blame to see if everyone committed the files they were responsible for. I also looked to see if there was a pattern of commits rather than committing everything at once right before class.
  • I used the self-assessment sheets
  • I used the web application assessment sheets.
  • I also used the in-class demos.

Section 1

Team 1 -83

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 14/20 In looking at the self assessments, one person thought their responsibility was backlog item X when everyone else thought it was Y. In class Scrum meetings I did not hear the 3 question, go around the team, format used. If I am wrong let me know.
  • The work was well distributed. 23/25 In looking at git hub there are 'unknown' commits so this is hard to assess.
  • Use of github. 19/20
  • One click install 5/10 points
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 22/25 ''' (combined peer & my rating)

Team 2 -89

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 16/20 In class Scrum meetings I did not hear the 3 question, go around the team, format used. If I am wrong let me know.
  • The work was well distributed. 23/25 One team member missing from git blame although there is one 'unknown' user.
  • Use of github. 19/20
  • One click install 10/10 points
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 21/25
  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points) One team member missing from git blame although there is one 'unknown' user. 8 points

Team 3 (section 1 team 1) 77

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 15/20
  • The work was well distributed. 23/25
  • Use of github. 14/20 seems like people writing code were not necessarily the ones checking it in. For ex., Owen's main page was checked in by Taitt
  • One click install 4/10 points password probs with mysql install
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 21/25
  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points)

Team 4 - 75

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 15/20
  • The work was well distributed. 22/25 No way of assessing due to poor use of git hub.
  • Use of github. 8/20
  • One click install 5/10 points
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 22/25 '
  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points)

Section 2

Team 1 -

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 14/20
  • The work was well distributed. 22/25 No way of assessing due to poor use of git hub.
  • Use of github. 8/20
  • One click install 6/10 points
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 25/25 '

Team 2 - 90

  • How well did the team follow Scrum methodology 18/20
  • The work was well distributed. 24/25
  • Use of github. 19/20
  • One click install 6/10 points
  • Demo works & quality of demo. 23/25

Team 11 (section 1 team 1)

  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points)

Team 11 (section 1 team 1)

  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points)

Team 11 (section 1 team 1)

  1. Every team member wrote code and used git. Assessed through using git blame (10 points)